Objective correctness isn't what ensures legitimacy.
from Diary 2023-07-14
Objective correctness isn't what ensures legitimacy.
You asked me how QV works, and I answered, but it's not the objective correctness of the QV system that ensures its legitimacy, but the number of people who subjectively think QV is "better" that ensures it.
99% of those people don't even read the level of what is written in the paper.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/客観的な正しさが正統性を担保してるんじゃない using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.